Home Page | Overview | Site Map | Index | Appendix | Illustration | About | Contact | Update | FAQ |
There are three types of cloning as depicted in Figures 10-14a, 10-14b, and 10-14c. Media report on cloning in the news usually refers to the type called reproductive cloning. In general, cloning is defined as an asexual process of producing a group of cells or molecular segments or organisms, that are genetically identical descendants of a single parent. | |||
Figure 10-14a |
Figure 10-14b |
Figure 10-14c |
Many cloning problems arise because of the key difference between normal fertilization and cloning. A normal fertilized egg contains genetic material from sperm and egg. When united, the genes in them turn on or off in a precise pattern that is in perfect readiness for the development of an embryo. Since clones do not undergo fertilization, this programming does not occur. When the donated adult cell is merged with the egg, the egg tries its best to reprogram - but it doesn't do very well. All the right genes are correctly reprogrammed in only a tiny minority of clones. To succeed in reproductive cloning, scientists need to understand how to reset these genetic instructions.
Sexual reproduction has evolved for two billion years and is the preferred mode after so many years of natural selection. It increases the rate of adaptive evolution and prevents the accumulation of deleterious (harmful) mutations. Cloning negates these advantages in favour of retaining some special characteristics of an organism. The argument is actually invalid because such characteristics are not determined by the genes alone; they are influenced by external factors such as the developmental environment (for the embryo) as well as subsequent growth and learning (i.e. wiring of the neurons) after birth.
In the movie "Jurassic Park", dinosaurs are cloned by extracting their DNA stored inside the mosquitoes (preserved in amber), with missing pieces patched up from the modern reptilian version. Scientifically, short segments of DNA has been isolated from 100-million-year-old specimen preserved in ambers - but not in such spectacular scale as presented by Hollywood.