| Home Page | Overview | Site Map | Index | Appendix | Illustration | About | Contact | Update | FAQ |
is related inversely to the impact parameter b as depicted in Figure 02a. It also shows that for a given
the incident particle can probe closer to the target (smaller b) with higher Ek. Since there is no way to measure b experimentally, the cross section
=
b2 is defined such that the incident particle is initially directed anywhere within such area. The Rutherford scattering formula is derived by identifying the alpha particles to be the incident beam:
(
,Ek)/d
= (Ze2/4Ek)2[1/sin4(
/2)] ---------- (38c)
![]() |
![]() |
This formula is related to the probability of an incident particle with kinetic energy Ek scattered into an solid angle d in the direction . The experimental apparatus to verify the Rutheford scattering is shown in Figure 02b. Figure 02c is the measured angular distribution of the scattered particles with incident energy of 15 Mev.
|
Figure 02a Impact Parameter [view large image] |
Figure 02b Rutherford Scattering |
![]() |
![]() |
The agreement between theoretical prediction and experimental data overruled J. J. Thomson's "Plum Pudding Model", in which electrons are suspended in a pudding-like positively charged substance that contains most of atom's mass. The success of Rutherford's theory gives him the distinction of having discovered the atomic nucleus. However, there is a problem. When the incident energy is over about 27.5 Mev, the experimental data start to deviate from the theoretical curve. Figure 02d shows the deviation at a fixed angle of 60o. |
Figure 02c Cross Section vs Angles [view large image] |
Figure 02d Cross Section vs Energy [view large image] |
(
,E)/d
= [(Ze2E)/(2|p|2c2)]2 {[(1 -
2sin2(
/2)]/sin4(
/2)} ---------- (38d)
=|p|c/E.
/dq2d
= (4
2/q4) (E'/EM) [(M/
)W2(q2,
)cos2(
/2) + 2W1(q2,
)sin2(
/2)] ---------- (38e)
4EE'sin2(
/2),
= (p
q)/M
E - E'. They are the 4-momentum transfer squared, and the energy transfer respectively representing such transfers from the electron to the "off mass-shell" photon with q2
0 (see Figure 02e for the definition of the various notations).
![]() |
![]() |
tool in the absence of a complete theory. In the deep inelastic region: ![]() , q2 , and 0 x = q2/(2M ) 1 (elastic scattering corresponds to x = 1), W1 F1(x), W2 F2(x). The F1(x) and F2(x) are finite and depend only on x. This relation is called Bjorken scaling. The usefulness of the parton model is that we can compare the scaling behavior of F1 and F2 against the various predictions for spin-0 and spin-1/2 partons, e.g., F1(x) = 0, and 2xF1(x) = F2(x) respectively for each case. Experimentally, the spin-1/2 model is reasonably satisfied (see Figure 02f). This result suggests that the partons are, in fact, just the quarks. Thus we have progressed from the discovery of atomic nucleus to unravelling the structure of the nucleon in about 100 years. |
Figure 02e Deep Inelastic Scattering [view large image] |
Figure 02f Form Factor [view large image] |