Home Page | Overview | Site Map | Index | Appendix | Illustration | About | Contact | Update | FAQ |
![]() |
light waves reflected from the object. The wave amplitudes are readily encoded on an ordinary photographic film. The phases are recorded as interference patterns produced by the reflected light and a reference coherent light (from the same laser). Each point on the hologram received light reflected from every part of the illuminated object and, therefore, contains the complete visual record of the object as a whole. When the hologram obtained from the development of a film exposed in this way is placed in a beam of coherent light, two sets of strong diffracted waves are produced - each an exact replica of the original signal bearing waves that impinged on the plate when the hologram was made. One set of diffracted waves produces a virtual image, which can be seen by looking through the hologram. It appears in a complete three-dimensional form with highly realistic perspective effects. In fact, the reconstructed picture has all the visual properties of the original object. |
Figure 01 Holography |
Figure 01depicts the process of making a hologram: |
![]() |
If originally a roughly spherical distribution of matter is contained inside an area A', the matter is induced to collapse to form a black hole as shown in diagram (a), Figure 02. Then the black hole's area A must be smaller than A', so its entropy must be less than (c3/G![]() The "universal entropy bound" is an even more stringent limit on the amount of entropy or information that can be contained within a volume of space. This time we throw some macroscopic mass ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Figure 02 Black Hole En-tropy [view large image] |
Following the prescription in the previous derivation, the increment in information is: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
1.6x10-33 cm (on the surface of the event horizon). It turns out to be around 3x10-13 cm as calculated from the size of the universe at about 1028 cm and the number of information n at the surface of the event horizon derived above (in the section for "Black Hole Entropy"). Or, to put it another way, a holographic universe is blurry, but the grainy structure is much easier to detect. Quantum effects will cause the space-time quanta to convulse wildly resulting in the noise picked up by GEO600. If this interpretation is proven to be correct, it will be ranked at the same level of achievement as the discovery of the CMBR, which also appeared as noise in the microwave detector. |
Figure 03a GEO600 Detector [view large image] |
![]() |
According to an article in the February 2012 issue of Scientific American, an experiment is being built in an abandoned shed at the now defunct Fermilab to probe the jitter of quantum space, which may be much larger than the Planck size as explained above. The setup is similar to the GE0600 experiment but with shorter arms at 40 meters (Figure 03b). In fact both of them are similar to the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887 except that they are looking for something else this time round. Instead of going after the speed of light in the two arms, measurement of the jitter of space depends on the tiny movement of the beam splitter as the supporting space thrashing whichever way due to quantum fluctuation. It is similar to a boat pitching on the sea. The result could be a pattern of noise as shown in Figure 03b. A second interferometer is under the first one to make sure the measurement is repeatable. |
Figure 03b [view large image] Probing at Quantum Space |
![]() |
Another example of the holographic principle at work involves the Euclidean Anti-de Sitter (AdS) space, which expands and possesses a boundary at infinity - much like our universe. The metric of such space has the form: ds2 = dr2 + sinh2(r) d ![]() where d ![]() |
Figure 04 Holographic Space-time [view large image] |
![]() |
A cosmological model based on the collapse of a four dimensional star was unveiled in 2014 (Figure 05). It shows that the three dimensional Holographic projection of this event corresponds to the Big Bang in our universe. The expanding shell of the 4-D supernova maps to our 3-D expansion. Its novel property includes an event horizon, which shields the singularity bothering so many cosmologists. The smoothness and flatness of our universe is just a reflection of the 4-D bulk, which had been in existence for a much longer time. The study suggests that the CMBR may reveal the spin and the presence of 4-D matter around the 4-D black hole. |
Figure 05 4-D Supernova |
![]() |
![]() |
For the case of 2 unit vectors at the x and y axis respectively on a flat surface, u = (1,0), v = (0,1); cos(A) = 0 or A = 90o. Now consider ds2 = g11dx2 + g22dy2, if we make a conformal transformation x = ax', y = ay', where "a" is a constant. It follows that the new metric tensors become g'11 = g'22 = a2. This kind of transformation will distort the distance between points, but the angle "A" remains unchanged (Figure 06). This is similar to the comoving frame in cosmic expansion. Figure 07 shows some more fanciful conformal mappings. |
Figure 06 Conformal Transformation [view large image] |
Figure 07 Conformal Mappings |