Home Page | Overview | Site Map | Index | Appendix | Illustration | About | Contact | Update | FAQ |
![]() |
Tachyon is any object moving with greater than light speed. By this definition the object reaches the observer (at point P in Figure 01) before being seen. After such object passed over, there are two images coming to view. There is first a bluish one with an elongated shape created by the Doppler shift and the aberration of light as it approaches to the observer. The second image is in red color and shrunk by the same kind of effects for a receding object. Figure 01 also shows the Cerenkov radiation, which is the bluish light produced by charged particles moving through a |
Figure 01 Appearance of a Tachyon [view large image] |
transparent medium at a speed greater than the speed of light in the medium. This is the optical equivalent of a sonic boom. In theory even though the object is not charged, it would induce gravitational radiation via the interaction with the mass in the medium. |
![]() |
![]() |
In Einstein's first paper on Special Relativity, he pointed out that as the velocity of an object or frame of reference v approaches the velocity of light c, many formulas in the theory become infinity. He then went on to declare that nothing can move pass the speed of light, and moving just at the speed of light is also impossible as it requires infinite amount of energy to attain that. This statement has been accepted by all text books in physics as self-evident. What had been neglected to mention is the fact that photon moves with the speed of light at the moment of its creation, since it doesn't need to go through the barrier. Similarly, a tachyon can be created |
Figure 02 Mass and Velocity [view large image] |
Figure 03 Space-time Diagram |
conceivably with a speed exceeding the velocity of light - again there is no barrier to cross (the barrier is shown in Figure 02). |
![]() |
dx' = (1 - V/v) ![]() dt' = (1 - vV/c2) ![]() where ![]() ![]() For example, for the case of dt' > 0, a process would emits +|E| particle earlier at t'1 and it is absorbed later at t'2, i.e., X-@t'1 ![]() To resolve the problem with backward time flow for dt' < 0, when the observer would see the process as emission of -|E| particle at t'2 and its subsequent absorption at t'1, i.e., X-<-E>@t'1 ![]() ![]() |
Figure 04 Time Machine |
In this way, the problem with causality is avoided. Such interpretation is consistent with quantum theory, the force-free solution of which always involves a factor of e-iEt. It remains unchanged with the simultaneous reversal of sign for E and t. |
![]() |
|
Figure 05 Feynman Diagrams [view large image] |
self-energy involve the "off mass-shell" virtual particles as well (Figure 05). "Off mass-shell" means that the relation E2 = p2c2 + m02c4 is violated - turning into tachyon. |
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 06 Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking |
~ 10-32 sec after the Big Bang. The process turns m2 > 0, and endowed mass to the particles. |
![]() |
![]() |
Bosonic Strings - It was found in the 1960s that the spin (or angular momentum) of a family of resonances (short-lived elementary particles) is related to the square of mass by a simple line on a graph, which is known as Regge trajectory. Figures 07 and 08 show the theoretical derivation of such relationship for |
Figure 07 Regge Trajectories, closed string [view large image] |
Figure 08 Regge Trajectories, open string [view large image] |
a few low-lying string states of the closed and open bosonic strings respectively (from the string theory). |
![]() |
will also be flipped to the opposite at precisely the same moment. This non-local influence (non-locality) occur instantaneously, as if some form of communication, which Einstein called a "spooky action at a distance", operates not just faster than the speed of light, but infinitely fast. An experiment in the 1980s confirmed that entanglement does occur. Nobody knows how information of one particle can be transmitted to its partner instantaneously, but |
Figure 09 Entanglement [view large image] |
whatever involved would likely be a tachyon. However, it has also been shown that the nonlocal correlations seen in entanglement cannot actually be used to transmit classical information faster than light, so that relativistic causality is preserved. |
![]() |
![]() |
which generates the neutrinos. Experimenters determined the flight time by comparing the shape of the proton signal at CERN to that of the neutrino signal received at Gran Sasso (Figure 10). After considering details like the curvature of the Earth, the tidal effects of the moon, the general relativistic effects on the GPS synchronization, and a lot of checking for experimental errors (Figure 11), they still left with 60 nanoseconds arrival time earlier |
Figure 10 Velocity of Neutrino [view large image] |
Figure 11 Explanation of Superluminality |
than if the neutrinos were traveling at the speed of light. |
![]() |
Although superluminal neutrino is apparently a tachyon (if confirmed by later experiments), another equally exotic explanation involves the extra-dimension invoked in the superstring theory. According to the theory our world is on a 3+d11 dimensional brane, which floats in a higher dimensional space-time called the bulk (Figure 12). Only the gravitons and possibly the sterile neutrinos can jump over to the bulk (since they are closed string). The shorten arrival time of the neutrinos is attributed to the short-cut taking by the sterile neutrinos when they appear in portions of the flight path due to neutrino oscillation. It is suggested that confirmation of the OPERAs result |
Figure 12 3+d11-brane and Bulk [view large image] |
would provide support for the existence of sterile neutrino, the first glimpse of extra-dimensions, and a step forward to vindicate the superstring theory. |
![]() |
A study in September, 2011 shows that the superluminal neutrinos would lost energy (at the high end) through the process of bremsstrahlung (braking radiation) producing electron-positron pairs :![]() ![]() ![]() The ICARUS team (in the same location of OPERA) follows up the idea with their data but for a different process in which the neutrino turns into a muon. Figure 13 compares the data (blue points) with a theoretical model (in red) for non-superluminal neutrinos. The result indicates that there is no superluminal neutrinos, otherwise the data would deviate a lot more from the theoretical curve. |
Figure 13 Test for Super-luminal Neutrinos |
![]() |
Another report in "Nature News" on February 2012 by the OPERA team indicates that there are possibly two problems involving the use of GPS. The first is the incorrect calculation of the time interval from the GPS to the synchronize atomic clocks at each end of its neutrino beam. The other involves a possible faulty connection between the GPS signal and the OPERA master clock. The two errors together can account for exactly the 60-nanosecond difference. |
Figure 14 Detection Errors |