Home Page | Overview | Site Map | Index | Appendix | Illustration | About | Contact | Update | FAQ |
The history of physics is closely linked to the unification of seemingly disparate phenomena (Figure 15-05a). Each stage of unification in turn advanced a new theoretical framework, which provides a deeper understanding of nature (Figure 15-05b). Figure 15-05c shows an in-precise time line with milestones for each important advance. The TOE in the image stands for "Theory Of Everything", which attempts to | |||
Figure 15-05a Unifications |
Figure 15-05b Theories |
Figure 15-05c History of Physics |
develop a theory encompassing everything in physics instead of merging (unifying) the rather disparate formulations. |
running variable. An invariance in such space is the length. It is the same in any inertial frames of reference. Other consequences derived from Newton's formalism include action at a distance, i.e., there is no time delay for the two "gravitating" objects to interact; and determinism, which assumes that events are entirely determined by other, earlier events. | ||
Figure 15-05c1 History of Gravity |
Figure 15-05c2 Newtonian Mechanics |
Figure 15-05d Electromag-netism [view large image] |
See "Electromagnetism" for details. |
Figure 15-05e Steam Engine [view large image] |
among each other in different inertial systems of reference. In particular, time ticks slower and length becomes shorter in a fast moving reference frame (with respect to the observer). Another consequence is the finite propagation of interaction, the signal can travel from the past to object A only with a speed less than or equal to the velocity of light. The light cones in Figure 15-05f define the space within which communication is possible. They form the event horizons for a particular time in the past or future. These ideas are in complete variance with the Newtonian Mechanics. However, classical mechanics is still a good approximation for phenomena involving low velocity (in comparing to the velocity of light). | |
Figure 15-05f Light Cones [view large image] |
[view large image] | |
Figure 15-05g Principle of Equivalence |
Figure 15-05h Electron Cloud [view large image] |
energy". The particle required to do the job must have zero mass and no electric charge to escape detection by the experimenters. In 1933 Enrico Fermi took up Pauli's idea and put it on a respectable footing by introducing a new force called "weak" interaction (manifested by long mean lives of decay in the order of minutes). The hypothetical particle is called neutrino. He proposed that when a neutron changes into a proton it emits a mediating boson called W-, which carries off the negative electric charge and excess energy, while the neutron changes into a proton and recoils. The W- boson then quickly decays into an electron and an anti-neutrino (see Figure 15-05i). Evidence for the existence of the neutrino came in 1953. The W- boson was discovered in 1983. | |
Figure 15-05i Weak Interaction |
nuclear force (Figure 15-05j) must be mediated by the exchange of another kind of force-carrying particle, which became known as pion. His explanation for the short range of the force is related to the uncertainty principle. If the pion has mass, then its virtual existence can last only for a short time. He estimated the mass of the pion | |
Figure 15-05j Nuclear Energy [view large image] |
to be 150 Mev. The actual mass is 140 Mev when it was discovered in 1947. It is now known that the pion is a composite boson, it is not truly a fundamental force carrier. |
Schwinger and others (Figure 15-05k1) in the late 1940s. QED makes predictions about the scattering of photons and electrons and other charged particles that agree with experiment to an accuracy of eleven decimal places. All the computations are perfromed by a procedure called perturbation theory, which seems to be very promising for small coupling constant. Each term in the perturbative series can be represented by a graph known as Feynman diagram (Figure 15-05k2). The K+ and factors in the mathematical expression represent the probobility amplitude of the process between points (s56 is the distance travels by the photon). At the vertex (intersection), the likelihood that an electron would emit or absorb a photon is e, where e is the electron's charge and a vector called Dirac matrices to keep track of the electron's spin. Conversely, a process can be computed by drawing graphs and then applying the Feynman rules. The trouble with Feynman's method is that it always leads to infinite | |
Figure 15-05k1 A Mini-Conference in QED |
expressions for the loop diagrams such as those in the fourth order electron-electron scattering (diagrams a - i in Figure 15-05k2). However, Feynman and others discovered that these are related only to quantities involving |
mass and charge. It is then figured out that if one simply corsses out these infinite answeres wherever they appear, and substitutes the right, finite answer, all the calculations become sensible again. This procedure is called renormalization. When it works for a theory, that theory is said to be renormalizable. The electroweak interaction and quantum chromo-dynamics are the other examples of renormalizable theory. Unfortunately, quantum gravity is not renoramlizable. New theories are being developed to allow the merger of quantum theroy and the gravitational force. | |
Figure 15-05k2 Feynman Diagrams [view large image] |
See some "animated Feyman Diagrams". |
and after all particle interactions. The processes in which parity is not conserved would look different in the mirror image (+ 180o rotation) world. With some hints from experimental results, T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang pointed out that conservation of parity may be violated in weak interaction. A test was arranged by C. S. Wu to observe the beta decay of cobalt-60 in a magnetic field. It shows a preferred direction for the emitting electrons (the left-handed electrons) and thus validates the hypothesis of parity violation for weak interaction -- the mirror world behaves differently from the real world (see Figure 15-05l). The three Chinese physicists shared the 1957 Nobel Prize for their efforts in identifying this peculiar behaviour in weak interaction. | |
Figure 15-05l Parity Violation [view large image] |
Note that parity will be conserved if there are equal number of electrons in both directions. It is a useful tool to predict permissible process when parity is conserved. |
in one mathematical formalism, as a single force - the electroweak interaction (based in part on works developed previously by Sheldon Glashow and others). The theory requires three intermediate vector bosons with mass to explain the weak interaction. The predicted masses of these bosons were duly observed in experiments at CERN in the early 1980s. A scalar field called the Higgs field is introduced in this formalism to endow mass to the gauge bosons Zo, W+, and W-. The lower limit on the mass of the Higgs boson is estimated to be 113 Gev. At present, there is no experimental evidence in favor of a Higgs boson, nor is there any against (see LHC updates, also "Discovery of Higgs" in July, 2012; and the subsequent Nobel Prize award in 2013). Figure 15-05m shows the Feynman diagrams for interactions in the Standard model including the electroweak and strong interactions. Development of the Standard Model was in limbo for many years until 1971 when Gerard 't Hooft showed that the theory is | |
Figure 15-05m Interactions in Standard Model [view large image] |
renormalizable by employing mathematical techniques such as path integral, gauge swapping, dimensional regularization, and numerical computation. |
Figure 15-05n QCD |
gluons to form a white composite particle (Figure 15-05n). Together, the electroweak theory and QCD constitute what has become known as the "Standard Model" of elementary particles. |
combining the two (such as treating gravity as simply another particle field in Quantum Gravity) runs quickly into problem of infinite Feynman diagrams. Figure 15-05o summarizes the steps in the evolution of the theory of gravitation. Each step in this chart builds on the successes of the previous one. Newton thought gravity was a force that acted instantly over a distance. Einstein proposed that gravity is just the manifestion of spacetime curvature. Quantum gravity assumes that gravitation is caused by the exchange of particle-like gravitons. Superstring theory identifies gravitation as the exchange of closed strings. According to Lee Smolin, there are three roads leading to the domain of qunatum gravity: | |
Figure 15-05o Theories of Gravity [view large image] |
A few of the other approaches to quantum gravity may turn out to play significant roles in the final synthesis. Among them will be the twistor theory and the non-commutative geometry. They will provide essential insights into the nature of the quantum geometry of space-time. Quantum gravity will emerge as a more fundamental theory since it will possess more explanatory and predictive powers. Figure 15-05p shows the relationship between quantum gravity and the other branches of physics at the limit of the various universal constants, where the gravitational constant G is associated with gravity, the Planck constant is for quantum, and the velocity of light c comes with special relativity. In quantum gravity, all the fundamental units are expressed in terms of G, , and c: Planck length = (G/c3)1/2 = 1.62x10-33 cm, Planck time = (G/c5)1/2 = 5.39x10-44 sec, Planck mass = (c/G)1/2 = 2.17x10-5 gm, Planck energy = (c5/G)1/2 = 1.22x1019 Gev, and Planck temperature = (c5/GkB2)1/2 = 1.42x1032 oK, where kB is the Boltzmann's constant, which relates energy to absolute temperature on the Kelvin scale. | |
Figure 15-05p Quantum Gravity [view large image] |
Figure 15-05q is a group photo for the physicists of yesterday. It was taken in 1927 at the Solvay Conference on Quantum Mechanics, Belgium. Most of the physicists are European males with 2 exceptions from the U.S. and one lady (Madam M. Curie), whoes entry was secured by the fame of pioneering the investigations into radioactivity. Table 15-01b lists all the participants with their nationality, field(s) of study, and the year when the Nobel prize was conferred (if any). Most of their names are linked to various kinds of theory, equation, and formula. It is very difficult to avoid them in a text book for physics. The year 1927 was within a relatively quiet period between the end of World War I (1919) and the onset of Great Depression in 1929. It was the heyday for the developments of quantum theory and relativity. However, all was not well. | |
Figure 15-05q 1927 Solvay Conference [view large image] |
Hitler was on the way to seize power in Germany. Nightmare would soon begin in 1933 when he became Chancellor of the Reich. |
Name | Nationality | Nobel | Field(s) of Study |
---|---|---|---|
Auguste Piccard* (1884-1962) | Switzerland | Stratosphere, Ocean Floor | |
Émile Henriot (1885-1961) | France | Radioactive Elements, High-speed Spin | |
Paul Ehrenfest* (1880-1933) | Austria | Electron Microscope | |
Édouard Herzen (1877-1931) | Belgium | Quantum Statistical Mechanics | |
Théophile de Donder (1872-1957) | Belgium | Thermal Irreversible Process | |
Erwin Schrödinger* (1887-1961) | Austria | 1933 | Schrödinger Equation |
Jules-Émile Verschaffelt (1870-1955) | Belgium | Secretary of the Solvay Institute of Physics | |
Wolfgang Pauli* (1900-1958) | Austria | 1945 | Exclusion Principle |
Werner Heisenberg* (1901-1976) | Germany | 1932 | Uncertainty Principle, Particle Physics, QFT |
Ralph Howard Fowler (1889-1944) | Britain | Stellar Structure | |
Léon Brillouin* (1889-1969) | France | Solid State Physics, Information Theory | |
Peter Debye* (1884-1966) | Netherland | 1936 | Low Temperature Specific Heat, Physical Chemistry |
Martin Knudsen (1871-1949) | Denmark | Kinetic Theory of Gases, Knudsen Number | |
William Lawrence Bragg* (1890-1971) | Britain | 1915 | X-ray Diffraction |
Hendrik A. Kramers* (1894-1952) | Netherland | Dispersion Theory, Atomic Transitions | |
Paul Dirac* (1902-1984) | Britain | 1933 | Dirac Equation |
Arthur Compton* (1892-1962) | U.S.A. | 1927 | Compton Scattering |
Louis de Broglie* (1892-1987) | France | 1929 | Wave-particle Duality |
Max Born* (1882-1970) | Germany | 1954 | Probability Interpretation of Wave Function, Born's Rule |
Niels Bohr* (1885-1962) | Denmark | 1922 | Semi-classical H atom, Copenhagen Interpretation |
Irving Langmuir* (1881-1957) | U.S.A. | 1932 | Atomic and Molecular Structures |
Max Planck* (1858-1947) | Germany | 1918 | Quanta of Light, Planck's Constant |
Marie Curie* (1867-1934) | Poland | 1911 | Radioactive Elements |
Hendrik Lorentz* (1853-1928) | Netherland | 1902 | Lorentz Transformation |
Albert Einstein* (1879-1955) | Germany | 1921 | Theories of Relativity |
Paul Langevin* (1872-1946) | France | Statistical Physics | |
Charles E. Guye (1866-1942) | Switzerland | Mathematics | |
Charles T. R. Wilson (1869-1959) | Britain | 1927 | Cloud Chamber |
Owen W. Richardson* (1879-1959) | Britain | 1928 | Vacuum Tubes |
Year | Author | Discipline | Subject | Equation(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1687 | Isaac Newton | Classical Mechanics | Motion of Partilce | |
1865 | J. C. Maxwell | Electrodynamics | Electricity and Magnetism | |
1872 | L. Boltzmann | Thermodynamics | Tendency toward Disorder | |
1905 | A. Einstein | Special Relativity | Constant Velocity of Light | |
1915 | A. Einstein | General Relativity | Gravity - Warpped Spacetime | |
1927 | W. Heisenerg | Quantum Theory | Microscopic Particle | |
1928 | P. A. M. Dirac | Quantum Field Theory | Free Field Equation for Fermion | |
1973 | GSW | Quantum Field Theory | A Model of Elementary Particles |
"Property Space". The "Source" is a specific property of matter responsible for generating the "Property Space". The "Metric Generator" is the rule (the mathematical equations - the distorting medium) for its production. The "Mediating Paricle" is the messenger to implement the rule. The "Property Space" is the final product, which could show up in various configurations or states to direct the movement of other matter with similar "Source" in | ||
Figure 15-05r Property Space [view large image] |
Figure 15-05s Distorted Image |
that particular "Property Space". |
Interaction | Sources / Fermions | Metric Generator | Mediating Particle(s) | Property Space | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gravity | Energy-Momentum | General Relativity | Graviton (?) |
|
||
Electromagnetism | Electric charges / e-1 | Quantum Electrodynamics | Photon |
| ||
Weak Interaction | Hypercharge, 3rd Isospin Component / , e-1 | Weinberg-Salam Model | Z0, W mesons |
| ||
Strong Interaction | Color charges / 6 left-handed ur,b,g , dr,b,g + 6 right-handed ur,b,g , dr,b,g |
Quantum Chromodynamics | 8 Gluons |
|
eight gluon states together with a diagram to illustrate the swapping process (exchange of the blue and green color charges). The numerical factor of 1/ signifies 50% probability for each of the possible state. | |
Figure 15-05t Gluon States [view large image] |
Figure 15-05u Fermion Table [view large image] |
The hypercharge was invented to explain the state of the electron and neutrino prior to Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB), which endows mass and charge Q to these particles. After SSB, Q = Y + t3. For example, t3 = (1/2, -1/2) for (, e)L and (u, d)L while t3 = 0 for (e)R. |
Figure 15-05v Dodecahedron Analogy [view large image] |
un-recognizable pieces (Figure 15-05v) - the various property spaces. |
also tried to show that all the interactions would merge in the tiny region (corresponding to high probing energy) within which the "central entity" resides. The attempt is not very successful (see left diagram of Figure 15-05w). However, the improvement is drastic (including gravity as shown in the right diagram of Figure 15-05w) if supersymmetry (SUSY) is introduced into the consideration. But none of the partner particles predicted by SUSY has ever been detected despite the deployment of many modern technologies (see dark matter as SUSY/WIMP or LHC updates). | |
Figure 15-05w Domain of Unification |
MSSM = Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, and see more beauty in "Conservation Rules". |